Senator Steve Fitzgerald may have agreed with Hensley concerning job oreanda casino growth but still voted “no” casino promo codes on the bill. All of the negativity surrounding Senate Bill 17 seemed to overshadow the positive aspects of the proposed legislation. “It will revive an industry that really needs our help,” he said prior to the measure’s rejection. One alleged perk that was apparently ignored was the notion of reduced taxes leading to more jobs. Supporters of the proposed legislation claimed that as many as 3,000 jobs could have been added to the Kansas workforce. Kansas has not been a region open to the notion of big government.
According to a 2014 opinion piece by Yael Abouhalkah of the Kansas City Star, the state of Kansas has been in a bit of a financial bind since Governor Sam Brownback’s 2012 tax cut. “We need to give the racetracks a second chance,” he added. Opponents also argued that giving casino owners an alleged tax break would lead to state-sanctioned casinos filing lawsuits to recover losses associated with recasting the rate for slot machines at horse and dog tracks in the state. “Can we force these facilities to open,” he asked. But not that kind of government. We ought to get out of the way and let the free market work,” Fitzgerald concluded, “We’re a government. Such is the reason why it favors conservative candidates in most of its elections and advocates for the welfare-to-work programs for the impoverished.
Senate Minority Leader Anthony Hensley alluded to the idea of Senate Bill 17 reviving a market in desperate need of renewed hope. There may a reason beyond the notion of limited government fueling the state’s refusal to give casinos a tax break, though. Racetrack operators who took advantage of this perk would have been able to also use the reduced tax rate to receive payment from debtors, in legal terms.